Supreme Court rules against Trump’s migrant protocols

Migrants walk in a caravan after growing impatience to wait for the humanitarian visa to cross the country to reach the US border, in Tapachula, Mexico on July 1.

Reuters / Alamy

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Biden administration can end the “migrant protection protocols” adopted by former President Donald Trump.

This policy required those seeking asylum in the United States to “stay in Mexico” until their case could be heard in immigration court. Some 70,000 asylum seekers have been returned to Mexico since the policy was enacted in 2019, and the Biden administration has sought to end the policy upon taking office.

The Biden v. Texas case represented an effort by Republican-controlled states to force the Biden administration to maintain Trump-era policy.

Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the 5-4 majority, argued that the Immigration and Nationality Act 1952 stated that the government “may” require asylum seekers to remain outside the United States. United, but did not demand it.

“Today’s decision recognizes and preserves the ability of the executive to reverse untenable, illegal and immoral policies, regardless of who holds the office,” said Bishop Mario Dorsonville, Washington Auxiliary and Chairman of the Committee of bishops on migration, in a joint statement. with Sister Donna Markham, President of Catholic Charities USA and Anna Gallagher, Executive Director of the Catholic Legal Immigration Network. “The implementation of the MPP has obstructed due process and subjected people to the same dangers that forced them to seek refuge in the United States in the first place. With this decision, we welcome the end of the MPP.

“While this decision helps pave the way, it does not solve the current challenges on our country’s southwestern border. We remain committed to supporting immigration policies that produce more durable solutions, respect the God-given dignity of migrants, and better reflect Christ’s call to welcome the stranger.

The moral need for comprehensive immigration reform became clear when more than 50 migrants smuggled in the back of a large truck were found dead of heatstroke outside San Antonio, Australia. Texas. The archbishop of this city, Gustavo Garcia-Siller, visited the hospitalized survivors, asked for prayers for the dead and called on all “to unite in solidarity, because these brothers and sisters are members of our family”. .

Meanwhile, Archbishop Paul Coakley, chairman of the bishops’ committee on home justice, lamented that the Supreme Court had restricted the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. . “The Catholic Bishops in the United States have long supported the EPA’s ability to regulate greenhouse gases to help address climate change,” Coakley said, citing previous statements. “We are therefore disappointed today that as a result of the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Clean Air Act, the EPA has significantly curtailed authority to regulate greenhouse gases from power plants. Reasonable regulation and legislation are essential to address the threat and challenges of climate change. We call on Congress to give the EPA the authority to meaningfully regulate greenhouse gases.


Source link