Will we see Bitcoin as a Proof-of-stake network? Some protests against the bitcoin code change suggest so.

There is always a war against Bitcoin. Since its inception, the revolutionary financial system has always been under attack. First, it was called a vehicle for money launderers and drug cartels to operate; then, the green card was rejected after its relevance could no longer be contained. Although the threats currently go beyond calls for global climate preservation and government regulations, the premise of the attacks remains the same.

Bitcoin operates under a proof-of-work consensus. This consensus mechanism requires the use of miners to solve a high-level computing question, and the miner who succeeds or comes closest to the answer will validate the next block. The game is a battle of speed and strength, which means that normal home computers are no longer suitable for mining. When bitcoin came along, you could make money with your 4th generation computer; but now, probably not.

Another consensus mechanism that has taken the world by storm is proof of stake. The best crypto coins for staking offer investors an additional way to earn passively and not just go through the buy and hold strategy. Ethereum, one of the most widely used and largest cryptocurrencies by market capitalization, second only to bitcoin, has begun its transition from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake. Although there have been so many hiccups along the way, considerable progress has been made.

This has allowed several calls from prominent organizations to upgrade bitcoin from proof of work. A crypto founder has joined the call, and this is the first time a prominent person in the crypto space has launched an inside attack.

bitcoin and energy

One of the most important parts of Bitcoin is how it is mined. Miners must solve complex mathematical calculations to mine new coins. To do this, they use powerful computers called nodes that constantly verify transactions on behalf of everyone who uses BTC.

It’s no secret that mining is a competitive and tough business. It requires knowledge of how hardware works and an understanding of cryptocurrency prices to earn money from your efforts. Bitcoin’s first bull run revealed these truths once again when competition skyrocketed due to increased demand for new machines equipped with high power demands.

CBECI data shows Bitcoin mining demand has increased to 116.71 terawatt-hours per year, just over 8% of total global electricity consumption for 2017!

The truth is this: we are talking about a small piece compared to other financial structures like gold and banks. The former uses about 240 terawatts per year, while the latter uses 263 terawatts.

What’s amazing about this stat is that it only takes a year for unused connected devices in the US to expend the electricity of 10 countries. In fact, if all the energy in these idle electronics were instead devoted to mining Bitcoin – which may be happening in part thanks to a new study by CBECI – then we would be able to power their network for nearly two years without fail.

Therefore, it is clear that Bitcoin does not consume so much energy. In fact, the amount of electricity wasted by industrial use is a multiple of the electricity used to mine bitcoin each year.

Why then is the clamor for Green Bitcoin getting louder?

Like many other changes, bitcoin’s format moving to proof-of-stake has seen uproar and protests. The goal is achieved by encouraging people and organizations interested in changing the way crypto works, as well as those who feel strongly about climate change itself. Ripple’s co-founder is partnering with Green Peace, a climate change group, to make sure bitcoin changes its code, just like Ethereum does.

The protest’s motto was labeled “change the code, not the climate,” and since there is no satoshi Nagamoto, it was aimed at popular crypto proponents, most notably Elon Musk. They say that by doing so, they can help create a more sustainable future for all of us, even if it means changing something as fundamental to how it works as Bitcoin mining hardware!

Environmental organization Greenpeace has raised concerns about Bitcoin mining, citing what it calls an “energy-intensive” process that uses fossil fuels and natural gas as a means to power its operations.

Environmental organization Greenpeace has announced that it will stop accepting bitcoin donations. This marks the end of his 7-year acceptance period. This decision was taken to avoid any connection with “the volatile cryptocurrency market”. Also around the same time, Elon Musk’s recent announcement made headlines about his company, Tesla, no longer accepting payments via Bitcoin.

Ethereum’s new proof-of-stake system will be far less harmful to the environment than Bitcoin’s current mining process, according to environmental group Greenpeace. The non-profit organization says that with this change in place, Ethereum can become a more sustainable cryptocurrency while providing investors with some of its benefits, such as cheaper fees and faster transaction times, by largely because it does not rely on unnecessary energy consumption from mining.


So what do you think? Should Bitcoin Follow Ethereum in Switching to Proof-of-Stake Algorithm? Let us know what you think in the comments below. In the meantime, if you want to trade your crypto tokens, visit Redot.com and check out our user-friendly platform. We offer 24/7 customer support, so you can always get help when you need it.

Read: Recent big drop in Bitcoin, cryptocurrency investable in 2022 or not?

Source link