Zabbix network monitoring against Paessler PRTG

When considering a network monitoring tool for your IT infrastructure, Zabbix and Paessler PRTG are two important options, and we’ll explore which one best suits your needs.

Image: Adobe Stock

For organizations in 2022, the majority of their business processes are conducted online. Valuable digital assets are also stored in network systems, making the proper functioning of their internal networks essential to ensure the success of their operations. Fortunately, network monitoring systems work to secure these systems and keep them running smoothly. If you are considering buying a network monitoring tool for your IT infrastructure, you have probably considered Zabbix and Paessler PRTG network monitors as viable options. This resource will dive into the difference between these tools so you can make the best choice.

What are network monitoring tools?

Network monitoring tools help in the upkeep and proper maintenance of organizational computer networks. This is done by constantly visualizing and monitoring the networks to detect any troublesome components that may fail or perform slowly before compromising the network. Monitoring tools then provide reports detailing the health of networks, so users can take action to rid their computers of assets or devices that may cause future problems down the line.

TO SEE: Recruitment Kit: Network Engineer (TechRepublic Premium)

Zabbix vs Paessler PRTG: Which Has Better Performance Tracking?

For network monitoring tools to be effective, they must analyze networks and report any issues so that they can be addressed appropriately.

Zabbix is ​​a web-based network monitoring tool that performs real-time monitoring automatically and simultaneously on all computers and devices in an organization’s network. For database monitoring, it supports Oracle, MySQL, SQL, and PostgreSQL. A potential drawback of the tool is that it usually requires the installation of a client agent program to monitor remote devices. With the use of agent programs, they support WMI, SNMP, and ICMP monitoring, and their agentless protocols include SSH, TCP, Telnet, and ICMP.

Paessler PRTG is an on-premises and cloud-based monitoring tool that does not require the installation of client agent programs for its data collection, making it an excellent choice for users who have many remote devices at home. within their network. Its monitoring supports cloud monitoring, packet sniffing, SSH, PowerShell, and push message receivers. Moreover, its database monitoring supports ICMP, SQL, MySQL, SNMP, WMI, PostgreSQL, and REST to name a few.

Zabbix vs Paessler PRTG: Which Offers Better Data Visualization and Network Mapping?

High-quality network visualization and mapping, as well as topology features are essential for users to have an overview of every device within a network system.

With Zabbix, users can develop custom mapping and diagrams of their organizational networks, allowing for easier visualization. For example, users can view the mapping between numeric values ​​and string representations along with their value mappings. The Zabbix web frontend allows users to view their collected data in map and graph form, and users can filter and organize their dashboard as they wish. Independent visual elements such as maps, graphs and data overviews can also be grouped together for viewing in a single overview screen.

Paessler PRTG also supports custom charts and mapping to display historical data and trends. Their drag-and-drop map editor allows users to easily design and navigate their data maps. Moreover, the product comes with geographical maps which can provide live information from anywhere in the world. For reports, their report builder tool can help users compile the correct data and organize it in an ideal way for their visualization needs.

TO SEE: 5 Programming Languages ​​Network Architects Should Learn (Free PDF) (TechRepublic)

Zabbix vs Paessler PRTG: Which Offers Better Data Analysis?

Network monitoring tools can collect and analyze data to provide insights and ensure the proper functioning of network devices.

Zabbix has predictive features to analyze and forecast data trends, so users can make proactive decisions. Users can set trigger severity levels that determine the importance of their data events. Users can also set smart issue thresholds, allowing the system to automatically detect anomalies in their incoming metrics stream based on the options selected. Using machine learning, the tool can also use Zabbix baseline monitoring to detect anomalies by referencing detected baseline values ​​through real-time history data analysis.

PRTG has a built-in protocol analyzer and several additional analysis features. The tool can use data to analyze bandwidth, develop performance statistics, identify bottlenecks, and more. Users can set custom parameters for their analysis and the system can categorize network traffic based on their custom parameters, IP address or protocol settings. The analysis results are then represented in the form of tables or graphs which are quickly created with their automatic report in real time.

Final Thoughts on Zabbix and Paessler PRTG Network Monitoring Solutions

Zabbix and Paessler PRTG data monitoring tools provide useful features to ensure the proper functioning of network resources. However, to determine the best option for you, you need to consider various factors. On the one hand, performance monitoring of remote devices involves the use of agents for Zabbix, whereas Paessler PRTG can perform it without the need for agents. Therefore, the necessities of monitoring Zabbix remote devices might influence your decision on which tool is best for you.

Personalization is also a notable aspect of these products. Although both Zabbix and Paessler PRTG have customizable data analysis, visualization, and mapping features, some customization features may be more suited to your organization’s monitoring requirements than others. Therefore, when choosing a network monitoring system, you need to identify the features best suited for your organization’s network and determine which option would best meet those needs.


Source link